|
I come to bury American Guitar Stallions, not to praise
it. Which is good, because burial, not praise, is what this
stinking sack of crap merits. Deep burial. In a fortified
and lead-sealed vault, if at all possible. American Guitar
Stallions is easily among the worst novels of the new
century. If anything, its very status as a novel is doubtful.
It possesses some, but certainly not all, of the commonly-
accepted elements of a novel. Characters? Well, there's one,
at least, and a few supporting cutouts; most notably a sex-crazed
girlfriend who appears only in wordy smut scenes. Plot? Not
really.
Theoretically, we're reading about a lovable rogue's efforts
to win an unlikely American Idol-style guitar contest;
but for each page of competition we get six of verbose description
of how it feels to play "Back in Black" through
a vintage amp. A unifying theme? Insight into the human condition?
Emotional hooks? Nowhere to be found.
What Stallions does have is words-- 38,614 of them.
This number, in fact, represents half of Stallions'
claims to being a novel; any collection of words that large
must be some sort of book, and this is certainly no technical
manual. The rest of its claim comes from Stallions'
having been willed into existence during National Novel
Writing Month.
For the past several years, a growing crowd of masochists
around the world have dedicated November to clogging their
computers or notebooks with awful prose in pursuit of writing
a fifty-thousand-word novel in thirty days. They register
at the NaNoWriMo website, where they post information about
themselves and their projects, and where they can log on daily
to update their word counts. FAQs and forums provide tips
for reaching fifty thousand (set a daily quota and stick to
it; don't be afraid to write total dreck) and a supportive
community.
And now a confession: I am the wretch responsible for American
Guitar Stallions. And while I have left the world of forced-march
fiction for the greener pastures of weirdly self-referential
journalism, the Twin Cities have emerged as a hub of NaNoWriMo
activity. More than three hundred people in the state of Minnesota
signed up for this year's campaign, working on projects ranging
from "sort of the great American immigrant novel, with
the Yugoslav civil war as the backdrop" to a Norwegian
adaptation of Goodfellas.
Gathering at a St. Paul coffee shop shortly before the ordeal
was to begin, this year's participants were giddy with optimism.
A rookie who went by the handle "Tomislav" (naturally,
he's the one working on the immigrant novel) drew cheers by
boasting, "This is going to be my first year finishing
NaNo!" Others related cautionary tales. "Sasha's
novel had a breakdown," warned participant Cory Strode,
speaking of a previous-year participant. "In about the
last ten thousand words, where she was literally telling herself
she couldn't do it in the novel itself...the novel was going
along and then all of a sudden, 'There's no way I can do this.
I am such a horrible writer and this completely sucks.' Ten
thousand words of that." As he related this, the grin
that usually adorned Strode's face twisted into a kind of
there-but-for-the-grace-of-God-go-I horror.
Reaching that final goal requires the novelist to produce
an average of just about seventeen hundred words a day, a
daunting task even without worrying about quality. Why do
people put themselves through this? The most common answer
to this reasonable question is that everyone says they want
to write a novel, but no one ever sits down and does it. NaNoWriMo
(yes, we really call it that; it's both a nod to the impulse
to reduce everything to an acronym, and a willful kind of
rule-bending that, I think, says a lot about this whole stressful
misadventure) offers a tough-self-love way to beat the urge
to procrastinate, to silence your inner censor by drowning
him in sheer volume. Strode falls into this camp, estimating
that he writes more every November than he does in all the
other months of the year combined. "I honestly think
that without the pressure, you don't write," he said.
Other writers nodded their heads in agreement, and I remembered
my own because-it's-there feeling of challenge that resulted
in Stallions.
Balancing the pain, all NaNos look forward to the sweet feeling
of logging onto the website on November 30 and recording that
they have forced themselves across the fifty-thousand-word
finish line. Megan Spencer finished previously by "giving
myself a word count, every single day....I managed to stick
to it last year." And then? "I printed it out, put
it in a binder, and thought about editing it, but didn't because
I was almost failing a few classes and had finals." Harsh,
yes, but she's still finished one more novel than most people.
Binder-banishment sounds like just the thing for American
Guitar Stallions. The prose feels as though it had been
written by a sixth grader with more ambition than vocabulary.
Stallions possesses a strange, lurching rhythm; the
text leaps forward with something resembling writerly energy
for maybe two paragraphs before settling into a tired, forced
plod in which the English language is visibly stretched and
disfigured by an apparent insistence to use five words where
one will clearly do. Invariably, this continues for bursts
of seven pages (which, coincidentally, would be about seventeen
hundred words) and ends awkwardly, without warning, often
in mid-action. The cycle repeats itself. At one point, possibly
the climax, there is a seven-page transcript of pointless
jokes emailed between the main character and his friends that
feels suspiciously genuine, almost cribbed from real life.
Stallions' ending is appropriately incompetent. You
can identify the exact spot at which the author flamed out
from the effort of churning out word after word of egregious
crap, the psychic burden of bringing so much verbal violence
into the world finally taking its terrible but inevitable
toll. One minute, the main character is preparing himself
for another round of competition. The page turns, the goal
is within reach, and "He loses and his girlfriend leaves
him. THE END." Given the book's near-total absence of
plot progression, it's tough not to find this fitting. Anything
else would have looked out of place at the end of this miserable
zit on the ass of American letters.
This article has appeared previously in in
somewhat different form in The
Rake.
|